- Ellora’s Cave Sues Dear Author Book Blog for Defamation
- Kobo Promises to Fix eBook Download Issue
- Hands On with the Pocketbook Sense
- Open Question: What Should I Write About?
- Apple Now Giving Tours of the Torture Room Where They Didn’t Catch the iPhone 6 Plus Bending Issue
- Polling Data Shows a Slight Increase in Online Book Buying in the UK
- The Morning Coffee – 26 September 2014
- The Bookseller Tells Us that 73% of UK Youth Prefer Paper Books, But They Forgot to Tell Us What Percentage Read Regularly
Posted: 26 Sep 2014 04:55 PM PDT
Romance publisher Ellora’s Cave has been having financial issues for the past year or so, but rather than sit down and fix them this publisher has decided that the best solution was a public and messy defamation lawsuit.
Court documents filed today in Ohio have revealed that Ellora’s Cave has filed suit against Jennifer Gerrish-Lampe, an Iowa lawyer who is better known as Jane Litte, the proprietor of one of the best romance book blogs (I did not know it was a pseudonym).
Ellora’s Cave alleges that a recent blog post on Dear Author defamed them, and in addition to suing the publisher also asks for a temporary restraining order – meaning that Dear Author might not be allowed to report that they are being sued.
Dear Author has been writing about Ellora’s Cave for many years now (more details),but according to the filing this lawsuit focuses on just the one post published earlier this month.
In “The Curious Case of Ellora’s Cave“, Jane detailed the rise and fall of this pioneering erotic romance publisher, including discussing the many current financial issues. For example:
The lawsuit was only filed today, but Jane has indicated that she will fight this suit. She’s looking for a good attorney in the Akron, OH, area with experience in defamation.
While I am not going to make a claim as to whether defamation occurred, I do want to introduce to an acronym which may be new to you: SLAPP.
SLAPP is short for “strategic lawsuit against public participation”. This term was coined to describe a certain type of bogus lawsuit which is sometimes used by malevolent individuals to silence their critics. For example, if a publisher wanted to silence a blogger who had been airing said publisher’s dirty laundry, they could file a SLAPP.
The cost of defending against a lawsuit can be onerous, leading some to give in. On the other hand, this type of lawsuit can also result in a Streisand effect, attracting even more attention to the story which Ellora’s Cave is trying to bury.
What’s more, even if this lawsuit doesn’t generate even more negative publicity for Ellora’s Cave, it will result in the public airing of all of that publisher’s dirty laundry during the discovery process. If even half of the rumors going around are true, we could well see many authors suing Ellora’s Cave for unpaid royalties.
image by steakpinball
The post Ellora’s Cave Sues Dear Author Book Blog for Defamation appeared first on The Digital Reader.
Posted: 26 Sep 2014 02:10 PM PDT
According to Kobo CTO Trevor Hunter, a fix is in the works:
Let’s hope they come up with a permanent solution, because over the past few months there have been an increasing number of complaints about this problem. And to make matters worse, Kobo CS has described this issue not as a problem but as a feature. According to second hand reports from several sources, the reason people cannot download the ebooks is that they are Epub3 format. (This issue existed long before Epub3, so that is probably nonsense.)
There has been no pattern to the ebooks that are afflicted, with both DRMed ebooks and even DRM-free titles from Tor Books blocked from being downloaded at Kobo but still readily downloadable at other ebookstores.
There have in fact been so many complaints that yesterday I was inspired to post a solution in the form of a calibre plugin which stripped the DRM from your Kobo purchases, converted them to standard Epub, and loaded them into your calibre library.
Isn’t it a shame that DRM made it necessary to jump throw hoops just so we could read the ebooks in the app we prefer?
image by clarle
Posted: 26 Sep 2014 10:07 AM PDT
Earlier this month Pocketbook announced a new premium 6″ ereader called the Sense. This ebook reader is looks like a Pocketbook Ultra minus the camera, but it actually has at least one extra feature not found on the Ultra: an ambient light sensor.
The Sense also sports a Carta E-ink and a designer case from the French fashion house Kenzo. Notebook Italia caught up with the Pocketbook Sense at IFA Berlin earlier this month, and they just posted the video today.
This ereader launched earlier this month as both the Sense and, in Russia, the Pocketbook 630 Fashion.
According to Notebook Italia, the Pocketbook Sense will come with the cover and cost 149 euros. It will run Pocketbook’s proprietary OS on a 1GHz CPU with 256MB RAM, Wifi, and 4GB internal storage. Measuring 7.5mm thick, the Sense weighs 175 grams and has a 1.5Ah battery.
It will also have the novel same page turn button as the Ultra, which is a pity. As I will explain in my review this weekend, the page turn buttons on the Ultra are one of those ideas that are great in concept but don’t work out so well in practice.
Even so, this is a very pretty ereader.
Posted: 26 Sep 2014 09:14 AM PDT
After nearly 6 years of blogging both at The Digital Reader and at MobileRead, I think I’m pretty good at finding and reporting news stories. But even though I think I’m good, I also know that I could be better at finding and covering the stories that you want to read.
And so this Friday afternoon I am opening up the floor to suggestions. I’ve always accepted editorial critiques, but now I am explicitly inviting them as well.
What topics would you like to see me cover? Is there an editorial slant which you don’t like?
And most important to me, do you have a suggestion for a how to post? I like writing them, but I have trouble brainstorming new ideas on my own.
The comment section is open.
Posted: 26 Sep 2014 08:55 AM PDT
News broke earlier this week that the iPhone 6 Plus had a structural weakness around the volume buttons which increased the risk that the phablet would bend. (I’m not calling it BendGate any more, I promise.)
There’s even a video showing just how easy it is to bend an iPhone 6 Plus using only your hands:
After the story broke, Apple responded with the claim that only 9 customers had complained. I for one don’t believe that for a second; with millions of iPhones 6 sold the number of bent units would have to number in the thousands.
According to The Verge, the tests include:
And so they have all that equipment and didn’t catch the design flaw? Okay, but I hope I am not the only one with a feeling of deja vu.
The thing about the current brouhaha is that Apple’s response reminds me a lot of their response to the iPhone 4’s antenna problems in 2010 (again, not calling it AntennaGate). As you might recall, that iPhone model had a novel antenna design that wrapped the antenna around the edges of the iPhone in such a way that if you held it like a smartphone your fingers would short out the antenna and you would lose the signal.
At first Apple denied the problem, but they later admitted to it and offered a free case to anyone who complained. And then Apple offered tours of their testing facility.
Apple has yet to offer an across the board response to the current issue, but doesn’t the response so far remind you of Apple’s reaction to news of that earlier design flaw?
The only difference between 2014 and 2010 is that we don’t have visual evidence that Apple knew about this issue in advance. The same cannot be said for the iPhone 4, because back in 2010 Steve Jobs was shown holding the iPhone 4 in a very weird way at the launch event:
That is not a comfortable grip, not unless your hands are huge. It’s also arguably not a natural way to hold a smartphone. While that doesn’t prove that Apple knew about that issue, it does make you wonder, does it not?
The post Apple Now Giving Tours of the Torture Room Where They Didn’t Catch the iPhone 6 Plus Bending Issue appeared first on The Digital Reader.
Posted: 26 Sep 2014 07:09 AM PDT
Neilsen released a survey report today which showed that online book buying is starting to plateau in the UK. Said report is of course behind a paywall, but yesterday The Bookseller released a few dribblets of data which were both frustratingly incomplete and out of context.
The report focused more on online buying habits than book habits, and according to the Bookseller:
They also note that “between 2011 and 2014, the number of UK respondents who intended to buy e-books online in the next six months increased 200%”, but they don’t give a percentage for either year, so that detail doesn’t help us any.
Given that Neilsen told us earlier this year that ebooks accounted for £300 million of the £2.2 billion UK Book market, and given that an unrelated survey showed that 13% of Brits currently buy digital books or magazines online, I don’t think 200% data point will amount to much.
More importantly, the detail that “books are set to be purchased online by four in every 10 people in the Britain” tells me that adoption of online book buying is not growing at any great rate.
I have data from a 2012 survey which showed that 36% of UK consumers bought books online. That survey also showed that 82% of respondents in the UK shopped online (this is a detail which The Bookseller did not share today).
It also tended to confirm other nonspecific details reported by The Bookseller, including Brits being “40% more likely to buy items online than Europeans as a whole”.
The post Polling Data Shows a Slight Increase in Online Book Buying in the UK appeared first on The Digital Reader.
Posted: 25 Sep 2014 08:19 PM PDT
Posted: 25 Sep 2014 08:12 PM PDT
The Bookseller posted the results of a recent survey this morning, and while it is nifty to know details like 31% of British youth don’t buy ebooks, I think they missed the more important question.
The survey polled 900 Brits aged 16-24 about their reading habits, resulting in the not so surprising news that many in the survey group prefer paper. Also:
That’s interesting and all, but I would much rather know what percentage of that age group are active readers. I would think that is the more important detail.
There’s an ongoing refrain that people are reading less these days, with article after article after article proclaiming the death of reading, and considering that this trend has been identified among kids in the UK I for one would like to know whether teens were showing similar habits.
I also think it would be a good idea if the UK publishing industry could find out exactly what percentage of the population were potential customers, don’t you?
image by secretlondon123
|You are subscribed to email updates from The Digital Reader |
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
|Email delivery powered by Google|
|Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610|